Criticism
greeitings user
WARNING: EMPIRICISM
I have recieved some criticism on an art.
The art in question is The Feminine Left, written back in early 2025, so it's a bit dated. Apparently, this person has written more about me (this is a 'continuation' of their stunt on me) but I wasn't able to find their other posts.
Their post is not marked with a date. I think it was written between August 2025 and March of this year, since their link back to my art is /t/v/ instead of /t/v/the-feminine-left. Idk if this was supposed to be forwarded to me, since the author refers to me directly (hey lucy!) rather than an audience.
In the first half, they more or less agree with me. I have no comments to make, so I'll skip that.
I wrote this:
"From this we get the culture of normalfaggotry. The existence of hiveminds have unfortunately been worsened by the evergrowing presence of negro culture within zoomer soziety, where normalfags all listen to their music, walk, talk, dress, and act like niggers. The normalization of degeneracy is in great part due to this proliferation of nigga culture..."
They respond:
No? Not really. The proliferation of “Negro culture” is mostly driven by white audiences and corporations — white Zoomers, in particular.
..white zoomers, ie normalfags. I should clarify that "zoomer" as I used it there is a coded reference to those loathsome normalfags, the kind you went to school with and whom make indecent, uninformed comments about your culture. "Victorian child."
I won't like the broccolifag pictured above merely because he's white. Come on, I'm a nuanced racist.
I don't contest that nigger culture is amplified/adopted by these kind of people, most of whom are white by a law of nature, that's my point exactly.
For example, artists like Kendrick Lamar and other major “representatives” of Black culture have far more fans of the Caucasian type. It’s more "fun" to be Black, or rather, to embody an idealized idea of what it means to be Black. This is a common pattern: a minority group creates cultural innovation in response to oppression, and then corporations mainstream it for profit. A majority of fashion trends, and trends in general, originate from some minority group.
Zoomers think it is fun to be black. You are repeating me, minus the corporate exploitation, muh nigga!
I will say, niggers made for some good ass comedy films in the 2000s. Maybe this is what they're referring to. But okay, we are more or less making noise and begging the question here.
This is all to say: what exactly is your issue with this? Why is it “degeneracy”?
All it takes is a moderately careful eye. Normies really do act awfully strange nekkit. SEAnigs don't eat pad thai anymore they just say nigger. Mexicans don't say 'ese' anymore they just say nigger. Like WTF zoomers?
If a more dainty, EHC culture (such as fascism) was implemented you'd instead see a world that is less fraught by things like "Nike," "scuba," "blicky," GAY TikTok dances and other such nonsense. Can't kids just be kids? Can't proles just vote for the president?
Might I add, this isn’t an argument of substance or logic; it’s an argument of morality something you later criticize “The Left” for doing, even though your own writing is filled with moral claims rather than reasoned ones.
I'll rue the day the author reads this post.
The author then brings up a point I never make and attempts to take that point down.. poorly. This is where their rebuttal is the weakest.
I presume you fall under the idea that all young Black men and women are “violent, inherently sexual, predatory” beings a stereotype which is not true. Most sexual assaults are committed by men, white men. White men also commit the most violent crimes in America.
Surely, the author must know my answer to this is "per capita" because it's dumb to generalize populations with statistics unless the numbers in question are adjusted for or context-ed with population size. It is not contested within academia that blacks commit a disproportionate amount of violent crime relative to population size compared to other racial groups...
But okay, I'll bite.
57.5% of sexual abuse offenders were white. 57.5% is most! But it does not tell you that white men are especially violent or rapey as a group, which is the relevant question if you're claiming that white men are uniquely more violent than other groups, which I think the author is insinuating. Whites will inevitably make up a darn lot of many things, of course they do! This is simply because they make up most of the population.
You can dumb it down further by gender, white men are indeed ~23% of the population. But you can of course do this for all races (as they point out, men as a whole commit most of the sexual assaults), and alas the point would still stand. White men are only more violent than other groups insofar as they are men, however not in relation to race. Unless you want to throw in the Asians, jej. But come on, that's a little cheaty.
In that case, injuns and blacks are overrepresented in sexual abuse offenders.
Most crimes are intraracial anyhow, these are statements which mean nothing in the grand scheme of your argument. Interesting, isn’t it? You never refer back to this point later in your writing. It seems like an excuse to write slurs as much as you can.
I don't see why crime being intraracial is relevant. Blacks kill each other more than they kill whites, that community is still violent!
'neway, the argument or point of 'the feminine left' was that the left embraced feminine qualities. Conformity is a feminine quality because wiminz like conforming or something. Wiminz shame each other into compliance, and LIE to each other about ""EGUALITIJE""!! Leftists DO IT TOO!
My statement or point about judeo-niggaic culture is that okay, well that's where normies conform. It is an introduction to a point about conformity, like Scott Alexander's reference to that beloved nobleman. I don't think i need to refer back to it, it is not exactly a cornerstone of that art.
...And they end with an accusation of intention. Ok.
If they continued this screed anywhere, I assume they went on to talk about my framing of men and women in politics. In which case, I'll concede this much; I don't believe that anymore. I think I overstated that a lot in my earlier posts. Again, it is quite outdated, written before I read Moldberg, and I would prefer that you read my upcoming race theory informed by Nydwracish political dialectics, "MUMBAI is ARYAN: Whitemaxxing as a means of Indian identitarianism."