vio lence
hi user
If you are not up to date, two right-wing teenagers shot up a mosque in San Diego on the 18th. They killed three people, and then themselves. They were of the tiktok tranime accelerationistcaca variety, so they're not like us high-SES Moldbuggians or whatever.
I won't condemn the San Diego shooting, just as Anders Behring Breivik has indisputable humanity. That's utterly banal and prone to leftist concern trolling. But I can't endorse it, either. The question of political violence is always tricky when you can just say "if you do violence then (((they))) will just use it as an excuse to crack down even harder on you and your friends!" And sure they do, don't get me wrong...
These are both things I have said in the past.
Second of all, I am not against the use of un-democratic means for political ends. The Cathedral cannot simply be voted out or reasoned with.
I'd anticipated that Trump would use Charlie Kirk's assassination to crack down on antifa trannies (who 100% endorsed that violence because Kirk was hecking racist Nazi), then antisemites, you, me..
Leftoids will praise the use of violence against him for saying things they don't like (hint hint: they're literally playing into the hands of the regime. these leftists cheering it on will be used to further marginalize anti-establishment sentiment) Repooblicans and Zionists will use this to malign their critics with antisemites and terrorism (and thus, justify censorship)
(..He didn't, by the way)
Spouts drivel about the need for violence, "you can't vote your way out of crisis," etc. etc., then the next second condemn the only people who take that action. Did they not do violence correctly? What are we supposed to do?
And quite intuitively we can just respond that well, killing random people is bad PR. Okay, it is bad PR, and it sets us back. Why can't these nuaccelerationistcacas who haven't read a single text on the topic target (((them))), i.e. people with actual power, instead of their imported bio-hazardous roaches? As a matter of fact, can they just stop being so gay and cringe? I'm tired of reading manifestos. We've all read this terrible shit before, except better.
.. This is an exclusively right-wing phenomena. Leftists won't denounce Tyler Robinson (even performatively) in the same way rightists are denouncing the San Diego shooters because what Robsinson did was 100% moral and good because Charlie was 100% unmoral and ungood, he was a (((they))) and not a random person whose disposition was a byproduct of some esoteric societal force. The dichotomy is quite simple... in our case, jews and their gay immigration policies; in theirs, tiktok slop creators and their evil right-wing indoctrination schemes.
And more importantly because the San Diego shooters genuinely did nothing good for their movement, as opposed to Tyler Robinson who was just doing his job, the same as AOC barking at liberals for not being woke enough. You can urge leftists to stop doing insane dumb shit with some moral justification for their cause, but the entire game of leftism is to do insane dumb shit with some moral justification. We're mistaking an end for a means. Even if it were the case that the stunt genuinely set the left back, which it didn't, they would still say those things. Just watch them double down on bringing back '2020 woke.'
If there was anything 'performative' about how leftists treated Tyler Robinson it was how they endorsed him, not if they denounced him. You'll notice that any leftist who complains about purity spiraling is immediately offed from the movement, even said to have never been a leftist at all. To be a leftist you have to perform your own cruelty and radical-ness-ity, because if you aren't radical and cruel to fascists you are enabling them. The leftists and liberals who were facefagging on Tik Tok dot com that day and the week following Charlie's assassination were just expressing glee for its own sake. If they didn't, or if they expressed some sympathy for Charlie, they'd more or less get the offing treatment. That's seriously the kind of community leftist rhetoric has cultivated.
Charlie Kirk was not a nobody you shouldn't care about. except he was, because he was just a podcaster. Throwing your life away for a guy that produced tiktok debate slop is insane. It's funny that shitlibs will brush off your concerns about Charlie Kirk with the "he was just a podcaster" (ie irrelevant, why do you care?) bit, then the next second claim that he was partially responsible for the genocide of Palestinians and that his platform was a vehicle of der hecking ebil fascism in order to justify his murder. How does that work out?
It works out because you can't justify somebody's murder if they are really just a podcaster.
When was the last time we had a good actor, one that was praised at least somewhat? Samantha Rupnow is never talked about and Solomon Henderson is treated more as a heartfelt DEI meme.
(interestingly enough, I don't think Solomon was ever bullied as bad as the San Diego shooters are right now after he did his stunt, despite them both being non-white, having abysmal kill counts and writing gay manifestos)
Payton Gendron? Gendron was one, actually white, and two, somebody who had a good kill count. These two zelligtroons are repping 3:2, while Gendron is like 11:0. Or, I don't know. Maybe I just find his manifesto nostalgic. He wrote this:
Why do you blame immigrants and not the capitalists? Both are the problem, and I would like to address the concept of hard and soft targets here. Hard targets are people with strong political powers, such as president’s, prime ministers, judge’s, media producers, and military leaders. Soft targets include the everyday man, with low, weak political power. To cleanse an area, both must be removed, one cannot only attack the blacks of Buffalo and expect the zog-bot government to fall as well, just as one cannot attack the zog-bot government and expect the blacks to fall. Both have to be addressed, I am simply attacking one at a time.
I wrote this about that:
The Buffalo shooter Payton Gendron cited that one of the reasons for committing the attack was to address one element of the problem, the 'soft target' (immigrants) and the other being the 'hard target' (jewish elite). It is unfortunate, because although i can appreciate his patriotism to the cause, they want nothing more than for you to further demonize white identity and fight among eachother, in a world where even the mere depiction of white youth existing is seen as some racist dogwhistle. But i have to give him a break, because he himself didn't put it past glowniggers to convince him to do it.
Gendron distinguishes between the (((they)))s of the world and random people, saying that he was just taking care of one part. But of course these random ten or so people's deaths, materially, won't be of any use for ze movement. It won't increase white birth rates or get rid of a substantial amount of nons. It was more about sending a message, or whatever.
I guess in theory, if you really wanted a white ethnostate, a genocide would be a pretty good starting point, but the problem is that most white people would be abhorred by the idea, perhaps rightly so, and you'd be rowing the slow boat to nowhere, doing what Gendron & co did. You'd be called a fed by your fellowship and your atrocity would be used to marginalize your movement further. It's not pragmatic.
The real praxis would be to passive aggressively participate in 'democracy' in order to one day blossom forth a post-democratic, post-political regime.
The trouble with a baby regime is that it may be post-democratic, but not post-political. So start easy. Abolish welfare, get rid of anti-discrimination laws and repeal the civil rights act. Just these three acts would make things substantially better, and they do not require a genocide or the killing of random Walmart shoppers. Democracy is the pwnage of the plurality by dynasties, and if all goes well the next regime will be ruled by autists and highly enthusiastic HBD constituencies, such as yours truly and Peter Thiel. And then we can keep going further with our transhumanist pipe dreams of genetically synthesized Aryans, universal free software, commercial explosive devices or whatever it is you retards want.
The next regime will be entirely devoid of politics, so you shouldn't worry too hard. The communists were insane. They did things democratic governments couldn't. Do you understand your mission?