N
hi user 39
Today is August 6, 2026. It has been one year since I posted the exposition of my green blog. I should be on my 78th post there, but we can't all have what we want. I thought it would be appropriate to formulate some small responses, and make some pingbacques to clarify things or whatever.
'Incels Are An Oppressed Class'
https://l337.neocities.org/n/ii/#16
There's probably another autist out there who has developed their own 'Critical Incel Theory', but for you and only you i will create another one. If racists are "race-realists", then Critical Race Theory is race-nihilist. If blackpillers are "gender-nihilists" then Critical Incel Theory is gender-realist. It is important we examine inceldom through a.. critical lense
This is something I wrote that always bothered me. It would be better here to say that blackpillers are 'sex nihilists.' CrIT is something I never got to develop, and instead we have about nine 'caring race theories' in the drafts.
'Coming Out of the Closet'
https://l337.neocities.org/n/ii/#17
The feds, minions of the Cathedral, were merely beginning to engage with the culture shift appropriately. Consider: Wokeness DOESN'T FUCKING WORK. It was imposed, artificial, and completely retarded in all aspects. It is a failed project of the Cathedral, and while the Cathedral does hold power, it is not immune to public opinion.
While wokeness, I think, did receive much deserved backlash by the proles, it is unfortunately not gone. I don't think many companies this pride month changed their profiles to rainbows or whatever, which is precisely the kind of thing conservatives choke on when they proclaim 'woke is dead.' But we still have AIDS-tier institutions such as 'University.' The Cathedral is far more eldritch and refined than performance activism.
The reason why Spic Fuentes seems to spend half of his streams baiting libtard media into clipping him is because he knows these institutions still have cultural power, even if slightly less so and expressed in a different manner.
There is such a thing as 'Woke 2.0,' as many have taken to calling it, which is a largely online phenomena. It is, broadly, an attempt at making wokeness appear transgressive and unlike its former iteration, 'Woke 1.0'-AKA-2010s-SJW-woke, which is apparently embarrassing to the Woke 2.0 people. But at its core, it is still the same moralfagging and complete AIDS-tier politics, even if they can find the strength to call someone a 'retard' now.
Someone commented on my Neoclitty profile some months ago that the left is much too focused on who says 'retard' and 'faggot.' The left could honestly do a whole lot better than that, and it does; the degree to which they care about this stuff nowadays I think was overstated by the commenter, at least the way I read it. I was going to forward xhem to Mark Fisher's Vampire Castle, who was a leftist that was amazingly 'canceled' by the left for criticizing cancel culture in that same essay, but I never found the chance.
And I don't think it is correct to describe federal agents as 'minions of the Cathedral.' Minions of the Cathedral are the people that write gay ass hitpieces which influence public opinion. The press will act as if it knows government secrets, and that's because it does. If we gave progressive journalists formal power in the fedral gummint, little would change if at all. The same is not true the other way around; federal agents are not interchangeable with San Francisco journos.
If federal agents have a place anywhere in the iron polygon, they are definitely of the red empire, which is to say ostensibly right-wing. They spent much of the last century sabotaging socialism and all that.. and they get really angry when they can't coom to Greta Thunberg.
Leftism can find a prophet in Curtis Yarvin, whose lingo demand you call Leftist Intelligentsia the "Bhramins". You cannot make this shit up.
I'm deeply sorry about this one, also. Curtis Yarvin is actually not all that bad, at least not in the sense I seemed to be going with back then where I insisted that he has completely subsumed himself in troonservative MAGA-tier politics. He is a jew, and maybe he is a bit impotent to enact the change he wants to see in the Trump administration (despite apparently influencing much of it), but he seems generally okay.
I haven't actually read much of Gray Mirror, even now, so it's still something I need to work on.
On the BDH-OV classification of Americans - I rejected it on the grounds that it is spiritually indian, and that it is too flattering to the progressives. This is LOW IQ racism to the core, and as a newly formed HBDer I must apologize. Americans are spiritually indian, of course their caste system is going to be a bit indian, but india is a great country with great cultural artifacts, such as the swastika and cow dung. Using it also enables me to Bhramin signal, much as Banania does.
'Banned Words Encyclopedia'
https://l337.neocities.org/n/ii/#20
I don't want to identify as either right-wing or left-wing anymore.
This is the worst sin I made on my green blog.
While I am influenced by the writing of Nydwracu, who was vehemently against adjectives in political polemics, and as a response adopted deliberately abstruse and absurd identifiers like 'anarcho-fascist,' 'critical legalist,' and 'reactionary futurist,' I don't think there's a world in which I can literally remove myself from the right-wing unless I have genuine change in principals.
I can tell you that I'm not right-wing, or just that I don't want to identify with the right wing, but that is exceedingly vague and of course defined negatively. It is a better practice here to adopt anarcho-fascistic group identifiers like Nydwracu. In 'Coming out of the closet,' I think this is what i was choking on, but coming out as a mere 'leftist' doesn't really cut it.
The point of trolling with deconstructions of liberal ideology, i.e. 'Anarcho-Fascism,' is not necessarily to transcend the left/right dynamic or anything like that, though I applaud people who do (with or without trolling), but rather to avoid being read as being a part of a social group with certain norms and expectations.
The intent there is threefold: first, to show that I don’t take myself entirely seriously`; second, to show that I’m not Following a School — I’m just some guy who’s trying to figure things out, I’ll mine for ideas anywhere I think I can turn them up, and I don’t want to end up in a social group with norms that would prevent me from doing so, or being read as such; and finally, as a test, a quick way to see if people will choke on ‘fascism’ or ‘anarcho-‘ or somesuch and tune me out immediately, or go “Anarcho-fascism? That doesn’t make any sense! It’s a paradox! How can you have anything worth saying?”, or whatever, or if they’re already on the wavelength that will make it easier for them to understand what I’m on about and presumably vice versa.
Of course, everybody and their mother is a supremely autistic (and unironic, mind you) ideology shopper nowadays, so if I want to participate in anarcho-fascistics I'd have to claim some shit like "muslim gender accelerationist." But I feel this is too trolly.
If I told you I am 'right-wing,' and for all moral and political applications I am, you would likely assume a lot of things about me that aren't true. You may even just stop reading my blog there.
This is also a reason why I have particularly mixed feelings about 'about mi' pages on the Neoclittian web. Babylon1984 put it a good way..
I hope the tone of my blogs speak more than a specific "about me" section
And they do. They are completely superfluous filler if you have a blog at all. I hope the tone and content of my blogs speak more than a specific adjective.
But, I will eventually have to make an about me page on my neoclitty site, since I have about a dozen broken footer links on my name.